Which of the following is an acceptable method to establish a noise ordinance violation?

• A. Two unrelated witnesses, sworn affidavits from one adult witness along with a video, or deputy witnessing
• B. Two unrelated witnesses
• C. A sworn affidavit from one adult witness
• D. A video recording alone

Answer: (A)

When determining a noise ordinance violation, evidence needs to be credible, corroborated, or observed by an officer. The most robust ways to establish the violation are: two unrelated witnesses who can independently confirm the disturbance; or a sworn affidavit from one adult witness paired with a video recording that captures the incident; or direct observation by a deputy. This mix of independent testimony, sworn and corroborated statements, or an officer’s firsthand observation increases reliability and reduces the chance of misinterpretation or false reporting. Video alone often isn’t enough without some form of sworn or official corroboration, and a single sworn affidavit without corroborating evidence is typically weaker than when paired with video.