Supervisor drives employee to drug testing location when

• A. pre-employment test
• B. random test
• C. post-accident test
• D. reasonable suspicion test

Answer: (D)

When a supervisor has reasonable suspicion that an employee is under the influence, the test is triggered by that observed impairment. In this situation, directing the employee to the drug testing location (often by arranging transportation) helps ensure a prompt, proper collection and preserves the integrity of the process. This specific action is tied to observable signs of impairment, not to a hiring step, a random selection, or an incident investigation.

Pre-employment testing happens before someone is hired, so it isn’t about on-the-job behavior. Random testing is determined by a schedule or pool and isn’t prompted by a supervisor’s suspicion about a particular employee. Post-accident testing follows an incident to determine if impairment contributed, but the driving factor in the scenario described is the supervisor’s observed impairment, which makes reasonable suspicion the best fit.